김영훈 최봉석 김은영 2018-11-15T07:56:39Z 2018-11-21T01:20:03Z 2002-12 C2002-32 http://repository.krei.re.kr/handle/2018.oak/14543 목 차 제1장 서 론 1. 연구 배경과 필요성1 2. 연구범위 및 주요 연구내용9 제2장 남북한 당국자간 경제협력 관련 회담과 의제 1. 남북한 당국자 회담 추이13 2. 남북한 당국자 경제회담의 추이28 3. 최근 경제협력 관련 회담과 추진체계42 제3장 경제협력 관련 회담의 주요 의제 분석 1. 최초의 경제협력 관련 회담 의제 분석(제1차∼4차)45 2. 대북 물자지원 관련 회담 의제 분석54 3. 정상회담 이후 경제협력 관련 회담 의제 분석63 4. 남북 경제협력추진위원회 후속 실무협의회 추진 현황73 제4장 남북한 농업교류협력 수요와 방향 1. 농업교류협력 수요①: 인도적 물자지원77 2. 농업교류협력 수요②: 농업복구개발 협력 82 3. 농업교류협력 수요③: 경제특구 배후지 농업개발협력112 4. 농업교류협력 수요④: 상업적 농업협력 제도 구축120 제5장 농업교류협력을 위한 의제 개발과 접근방향 1. 남북 농업교류협력과 관련된 기존 의제 검토124 2. 분야별 의제 개발137 3. 농업교류협력 관련 협상의 접근 방안147 제6장 요약 및 결론152 참고 문 헌159 NGO`s activities can be legitimate because they are based on social phenomena and because NGOs play an important role in responding to social dysfunction. Also, the appearance of the concept of global governance shows the importance of NGO`s activities and the necessity of their participation in the policy process. The purposes of this study are to analyze how NGOs participate in the agricultural policy process and to depict what the desirable ways of their policy participation are. Research methods for this study are as follows: first, in order to analyze the real situations of policy participation of agriculture-related NGOs, we analyzed twenty eight agriculture-related NGOs based on the data collected by questionnaire and interviews and compared them with data gained by analyzing fifty eight general NGOs located in Seoul; second, in order to evaluate the participation of agriculture-related NGOs in the policy process, we conducted questionnaire from interviewing NGOs` staffs and public officials and compared two groups. It is proved that the objective conditions of NGOs are not related to the positiveness or spontaneity of their activities. The positiveness and spontaneity of their activities are not closely related to the objective conditions, but to their intrinsic goals and characteristics. The necessity of NGOs` participation in the policy process is recognized by NGOs and policy authorities. NGO`s participation can make policy makers agricultural policies based on real fields and establish cooperation relationship between two groups. Also, they have common opinion about NGO`s participation in setting up the fundamental plan like mid- and long-term agricultural and rural development plans. On the other hand, there are differences in the disadvantages of NGO`s participation and the obstacles on the activation of NGO`s participation. There were considerable changes in the ways and modes of NGO`s participation. The modes and ways of participation have been diversified such as movement shifts from illegal riots to legal and formal participation of being a partner of formal committees and commissions. However, in general, the participation is still more formal. NGOs think that government policies have not reflected the voices of actual fields. Because government authority thinks that NGOs have stated their interest rather than the interests of the agricultural sector as a whole, they could not help having limitations in responding to related NGOs` voices. That is, public officials understand these phenomena as a sort of Nimby. In order to solve these problems, NGOs` participation should be directed to setting up their substantial participation. It is very meaningful for government authorities to carry out cooperative projects with NGOs. Korean agriculture is not competitive as a whole. Only a few items have competitiveness. Rebuilding agricultural vitality depends upon the change of paradigm based on the new recognition of agriculture and rural areas such as multi-functionality. The basic premise in building a new paradigm is that the protection of agriculture and government subsidy should be based on general people's consensus. NGOs are the most desirable organizations that try to pursue their goals without their own interests according to the principles of social justice and public interest in order to gain people's consensus. Some projects that need public relations carried out by NGOs having integrity may be better than by government agencies. In this aspect, existing policy response of policy authority may not be active. Although government authorities formalize NGO`s participation according to timely needs, their positive will has been positive in establishing a new paradigm for policy participation. They do not recognize the necessity and value of NGO`s participation in the policy process in terms of the protection of agriculture based on the persuasion of people. The desirable way of civilian policy participation is that agricultural policy authority should recognize NGOs as policy partners and carry out agricultural projects substantially. The way of cooperation between NGOs and policy authorities should be different from issues and make sure the roles of NGOs and policy authority. Especially, NGOs carry out projects that need the consensus of people and public relations. There are some improvements in relationship between NGOs and policy authorities. First, mutual understanding between them should be expanded. Both sides should expand relationships and put lots of efforts to understand each other. Also, existing relationship of the provision of supports and the reception of benefits should be changed to the relationship of mutual cooperation. Second, the way of policy participation of NGOs should be diversified and substantialized such as participating committees having decision-making authority and the delegation of agricultural policy implementation. The objects of privatization of agricultural policy areas are education for consumers and general public and commercialized fields enabling to run projects without government supports. For example, the involved are the education for environmentally friendly agriculture and retuning to the farming, green tourism and rural amenity, consulting farming, and so on. Foreign cases shed some lights on reforming the mode of policy participation of NGOs. French Agricultural Lead Committee can be adopted. However, institutional improvement needs other previous conditions like government organizational reform. 남북한 당국자간 농업협상을 위한 의제 개발 및 대응 방안 Agendas for inter-Korean agricultural negotiations and the responses KREI 보고서 Kim, Younghoon Kim, Eunyoung 9999-12-31 9999-12-31