새로운 농촌 건설을 위한 농촌개발과 복지증진 대책
- 영문 제목
- Rural development for new rural village and measures to enhance rural welfare
- 출판년도
- 2002-12
- 목차
- 목 차제1편 농촌개발과 복지증진의 방향과 과제제1장 농업?농촌의 여건 변화와 전망 1. '90년대 농정과 농업?농촌의 실상 2. 대내외 여건의변화와 전망제2장 농정 기조의 전환과 주요 정책과제 1. 농업?농촌의 새로운 패러다임 2. 주요 농정과제와추진방향제3장 농촌 공간정비와 지역 활성화 1. 쾌적한 정주 공간의 조성 2. 다양한 소득원 창출과 농촌경제활성화 3. 농촌 개발체계의 개선제4장 농가소득 안정과 위험관리시스템 구축 1. 직접지불제의 확충과 개선 2. 경영안정을 위한위험관리시스템 구축제5장 농촌 주민의 복지 증진 1. 농업?농촌 교육여건의 개선 2. 농촌지역 보건의료서비스의개선 3. 농촌 복지제도의 확립제6장 농업 투융자 및 농정 추진체계 1. 농업 재정정책의 방향 2. 농정 추진체계의개선제2편 새로운 농촌건설을 위한 정책과제 분석제1장 개방화에 따른 농업부문 영향과 전망 1. 기본 전제와 가정 2. 개방화에 따른 영향분석 3. 농업의 중장기 지표 전망제2장 식량자급률 목표 설정과 과제 1. 현황과 문제점 2. 식량자급률 전망과 목표 자급률분석 3. 자급률 제고를 위한 정책과제 4. 정책 제언제3장 농정 추진체제의 개편 방안 1. 검토 배경 2. 농정 추진의 현황과 과제 3.외국의 농정추진 동향 4. 농정 추진체제 개편의 방향제4장 농가 소득안정 정책의 체계화 방안 1. 농업소득 문제의 실상 2. 농가소득 안정정책의과제 3. 여건의 변화와 정책 방향제5장 도시자본의 농어촌 유치 1. 검토 배경 2. 추진방향과 주요과제 3.세부추진방안제6장 농촌관광 발전을 위한 정책과제 1. 농촌 경제의 실상 2. 외국의 농촌관광정책 3. 국내 농촌관광의 현황 4. 농촌관광 정책의 방향 5. 농촌관광 활성화를 위한정책 과제제7장 농촌의 미래상과 지표 전망 1. 검토 배경 2. 인구를 중심으로 본 농촌 정주여건변화 3. 농촌의 장래 인구 예측 4. 미래 농촌의 모습제8장 농어촌 공간의 계획적 정비방안 1. 논의의 배경과 목적 2. 농촌계획의 전제적논의 3. 농촌계획의 존재 의의와 주요 쟁점 4. 농촌계획의 위상과 방향 설정을 위한 제안5. 농촌계획의 작동을 위한 보완과제제9장 소규모 종합개발사업의 추진방안 1. 검토 배경 2. 현황과 문제점 3. 소규모종합개발사업의 발전방향 4. 소규모 농촌종합개발의 정책과제제10장 농촌개발사업의 재원확충 방안 1. 검토 배경 2. 농촌 개발사업의 운영체계와재원 3. 농촌개발사업의 재원확충 방안제11장 농어촌복지특별법 제정 및 운영방안 1. 특별법에 관한 관련단체의 주장 2. 특별법 제정에고려해야 할 사항 3. 특별법의 구성과 주요 내용제12장 농어촌 보건의료서비스의 문제점과 개선방안 1. 농어촌의 주요지표 변화 2. 농어촌 보건의료의현황 3. 그 동안 진행된 농어촌지역을 위한 보건정책 4. 농어촌 보건의료의 문제점 5.농어촌 보건의료서비스의 개선방안제13장 농어업?농어촌 교육제도 개선방안 1. 농어촌 교육의 문제점과 개선방안 2. 농업계 학교교육의개선방안제14장 농촌지역 국민연금제도 개선방안 1. 현황과 문제점 2. 국민연금제도의 과제3. 주요 정책과제와 개선방안제15장 국민기초생활보장제도의 개선방안 1. 기초생활보장제도의 운영 실태 2. 기초생활보장제도의문제점 3. 기초생활보장제도의 개선 방향 4. 주요 정책과제제16장 농어촌 문화복지의 개선 1. 현황과 문제점 2. 농어촌 문화정책 발전방향3. 주요 정책과제 4. 추진전략제17장 농가도우미제도 개선방안 1. 필요성과 실태 2. 농촌의 변화와 여성농업인복지정책 3. 농가도우미제도 평가 4. 농가도우미제도 개선방안 5. 기대효과제18장 농어촌 노인복지의 증진 1. 농어촌 인구의 노령화 2. 농어촌 노인복지 관련 정책의현황 3. 현행 농어촌 노인복지정책의 문제점 4. 농어촌 노인복지 증진 대책
NGO`s activities can be legitimate because they are based on socialphenomena and because NGOs play an important role in responding to socialdysfunction. Also, the appearance of the concept of global governance shows theimportance of NGO`s activities and the necessity of their participation in thepolicy process.The purposes of this study are to analyze how NGOs participate in theagricultural policy process and to depict what the desirable ways of theirpolicy participation are.Research methods for this study are as follows: first, in order toanalyze the real situations of policy participation of agriculture-related NGOs,we analyzed twenty eight agriculture-related NGOs based on the data collected byquestionnaire and interviews and compared them with data gained by analyzingfifty eight general NGOs located in Seoul; second, in order to evaluate theparticipation of agriculture-related NGOs in the policy process, we conductedquestionnaire from interviewing NGOs` staffs and public officials and comparedtwo groups.It is proved that the objective conditions of NGOs are not related tothe positiveness or spontaneity of their activities. The positiveness andspontaneity of their activities are not closely related to the objectiveconditions, but to their intrinsic goals and characteristics.The necessity of NGOs` participation in the policy process isrecognized by NGOs and policy authorities. NGO`s participation can make policymakers agricultural policies based on real fields and establish cooperationrelationship between two groups. Also, they have common opinion about NGO`sparticipation in setting up the fundamental plan like mid- and long-termagricultural and rural development plans. On the other hand, there aredifferences in the disadvantages of NGO`s participation and the obstacles on theactivation of NGO`s participation.There were considerable changes in the ways and modes of NGO`sparticipation. The modes and ways of participation have been diversified such asmovement shifts from illegal riots to legal and formal participation of being apartner of formal committees and commissions. However, in general, theparticipation is still more formal. NGOs think that government policies have notreflected the voices of actual fields. Because government authority thinks thatNGOs have stated their interest rather than the interests of the agriculturalsector as a whole, they could not help having limitations in responding torelated NGOs` voices. That is, public officials understand these phenomena as asort of Nimby. In order to solve these problems, NGOs` participationshould be directed to setting up their substantial participation.It is very meaningful for government authorities to carry outcooperative projects with NGOs. Korean agriculture is not competitive as awhole. Only a few items have competitiveness. Rebuilding agriculturalvitality depends upon the change of paradigm based on the new recognition ofagriculture and rural areas such as multi-functionality. The basic premisein building a new paradigm is that the protection of agriculture and governmentsubsidy should be based on general people's consensus. NGOs are the mostdesirable organizations that try to pursue their goals without their owninterests according to the principles of social justice and public interest inorder to gain people's consensus. Some projects that need public relationscarried out by NGOs having integrity may be better than by governmentagencies.In this aspect, existing policy response of policy authority may not beactive. Although government authorities formalize NGO`s participationaccording to timely needs, their positive will has been positive in establishinga new paradigm for policy participation. They do not recognize the necessity andvalue of NGO`s participation in the policy process in terms of the protection ofagriculture based on the persuasion of people.The desirable way of civilian policy participation is that agriculturalpolicy authority should recognize NGOs as policy partners and carry outagricultural projects substantially. The way of cooperation between NGOs andpolicy authorities should be different from issues and make sure the rolesof NGOs and policy authority. Especially, NGOs carry out projects that need theconsensus of people and public relations.There are some improvements in relationship between NGOs and policyauthorities. First, mutual understanding between them should be expanded. Bothsides should expand relationships and put lots of efforts to understandeach other. Also, existing relationship of the provision of supports and thereception of benefits should be changed to the relationship of mutualcooperation. Second, the way of policy participation of NGOs should bediversified and substantialized such as participating committees havingdecision-making authority and the delegation of agricultural policyimplementation. The objects of privatization of agricultural policy areas areeducation for consumers and general public and commercialized fields enabling torun projects without government supports. For example, the involved are theeducation for environmentally friendly agriculture and retuning to the farming,green tourism and rural amenity, consulting farming, and so on.Foreign cases shed some lights on reforming the mode of policyparticipation of NGOs. French Agricultural Lead Committee can be adopted.However, institutional improvement needs other previous conditions likegovernment organizational reform.
- 발간물 유형
- KREI 보고서
- Files in This Item:
- There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.