새로운 농촌 건설을 위한 농촌개발과 복지증진 대책
- 영문 제목
- Rural development for new rural village and measures to enhance rural welfare
- 출판년도
- 2002-12
- 목차
- 목 차
제1편 농촌개발과 복지증진의 방향과 과제
제1장 농업?농촌의 여건 변화와 전망
1. '90년대 농정과 농업?농촌의 실상
2. 대내외 여건의
변화와 전망
제2장 농정 기조의 전환과 주요 정책과제
1. 농업?농촌의 새로운 패러다임
2. 주요 농정과제와
추진방향
제3장 농촌 공간정비와 지역 활성화
1. 쾌적한 정주 공간의 조성
2. 다양한 소득원 창출과 농촌경제
활성화
3. 농촌 개발체계의 개선
제4장 농가소득 안정과 위험관리시스템 구축
1. 직접지불제의 확충과 개선
2. 경영안정을 위한
위험관리시스템 구축
제5장 농촌 주민의 복지 증진
1. 농업?농촌 교육여건의 개선
2. 농촌지역 보건의료서비스의
개선
3. 농촌 복지제도의 확립
제6장 농업 투융자 및 농정 추진체계
1. 농업 재정정책의 방향
2. 농정 추진체계의
개선
제2편 새로운 농촌건설을 위한 정책과제 분석
제1장 개방화에 따른 농업부문 영향과 전망
1. 기본 전제와 가정
2. 개방화에 따른 영향
분석
3. 농업의 중장기 지표 전망
제2장 식량자급률 목표 설정과 과제
1. 현황과 문제점
2. 식량자급률 전망과 목표 자급률
분석
3. 자급률 제고를 위한 정책과제
4. 정책 제언
제3장 농정 추진체제의 개편 방안
1. 검토 배경
2. 농정 추진의 현황과 과제
3.
외국의 농정추진 동향
4. 농정 추진체제 개편의 방향
제4장 농가 소득안정 정책의 체계화 방안
1. 농업소득 문제의 실상
2. 농가소득 안정정책의
과제
3. 여건의 변화와 정책 방향
제5장 도시자본의 농어촌 유치
1. 검토 배경
2. 추진방향과 주요과제
3.
세부추진방안
제6장 농촌관광 발전을 위한 정책과제
1. 농촌 경제의 실상
2. 외국의 농촌관광
정책
3. 국내 농촌관광의 현황
4. 농촌관광 정책의 방향
5. 농촌관광 활성화를 위한
정책 과제
제7장 농촌의 미래상과 지표 전망
1. 검토 배경
2. 인구를 중심으로 본 농촌 정주여건
변화
3. 농촌의 장래 인구 예측
4. 미래 농촌의 모습
제8장 농어촌 공간의 계획적 정비방안
1. 논의의 배경과 목적
2. 농촌계획의 전제적
논의
3. 농촌계획의 존재 의의와 주요 쟁점
4. 농촌계획의 위상과 방향 설정을 위한 제안
5. 농촌계획의 작동을 위한 보완과제
제9장 소규모 종합개발사업의 추진방안
1. 검토 배경
2. 현황과 문제점
3. 소규모
종합개발사업의 발전방향
4. 소규모 농촌종합개발의 정책과제
제10장 농촌개발사업의 재원확충 방안
1. 검토 배경
2. 농촌 개발사업의 운영체계와
재원
3. 농촌개발사업의 재원확충 방안
제11장 농어촌복지특별법 제정 및 운영방안
1. 특별법에 관한 관련단체의 주장
2. 특별법 제정에
고려해야 할 사항
3. 특별법의 구성과 주요 내용
제12장 농어촌 보건의료서비스의 문제점과 개선방안
1. 농어촌의 주요지표 변화
2. 농어촌 보건의료의
현황
3. 그 동안 진행된 농어촌지역을 위한 보건정책
4. 농어촌 보건의료의 문제점
5.
농어촌 보건의료서비스의 개선방안
제13장 농어업?농어촌 교육제도 개선방안
1. 농어촌 교육의 문제점과 개선방안
2. 농업계 학교교육의
개선방안
제14장 농촌지역 국민연금제도 개선방안
1. 현황과 문제점
2. 국민연금제도의 과제
3. 주요 정책과제와 개선방안
제15장 국민기초생활보장제도의 개선방안
1. 기초생활보장제도의 운영 실태
2. 기초생활보장제도의
문제점
3. 기초생활보장제도의 개선 방향
4. 주요 정책과제
제16장 농어촌 문화복지의 개선
1. 현황과 문제점
2. 농어촌 문화정책 발전방향
3. 주요 정책과제
4. 추진전략
제17장 농가도우미제도 개선방안
1. 필요성과 실태
2. 농촌의 변화와 여성농업인
복지정책
3. 농가도우미제도 평가
4. 농가도우미제도 개선방안
5. 기대효과
제18장 농어촌 노인복지의 증진
1. 농어촌 인구의 노령화
2. 농어촌 노인복지 관련 정책의
현황
3. 현행 농어촌 노인복지정책의 문제점
4. 농어촌 노인복지 증진 대책
NGO`s activities can be legitimate because they are based on social
phenomena and because NGOs play an important role in responding to social
dysfunction. Also, the appearance of the concept of global governance shows the
importance of NGO`s activities and the necessity of their participation in the
policy process.
The purposes of this study are to analyze how NGOs participate in the
agricultural policy process and to depict what the desirable ways of their
policy participation are.
Research methods for this study are as follows: first, in order to
analyze the real situations of policy participation of agriculture-related NGOs,
we analyzed twenty eight agriculture-related NGOs based on the data collected by
questionnaire and interviews and compared them with data gained by analyzing
fifty eight general NGOs located in Seoul; second, in order to evaluate the
participation of agriculture-related NGOs in the policy process, we conducted
questionnaire from interviewing NGOs` staffs and public officials and compared
two groups.
It is proved that the objective conditions of NGOs are not related to
the positiveness or spontaneity of their activities. The positiveness and
spontaneity of their activities are not closely related to the objective
conditions, but to their intrinsic goals and characteristics.
The necessity of NGOs` participation in the policy process is
recognized by NGOs and policy authorities. NGO`s participation can make policy
makers agricultural policies based on real fields and establish cooperation
relationship between two groups. Also, they have common opinion about NGO`s
participation in setting up the fundamental plan like mid- and long-term
agricultural and rural development plans. On the other hand, there are
differences in the disadvantages of NGO`s participation and the obstacles on the
activation of NGO`s participation.
There were considerable changes in the ways and modes of NGO`s
participation. The modes and ways of participation have been diversified such as
movement shifts from illegal riots to legal and formal participation of being a
partner of formal committees and commissions. However, in general, the
participation is still more formal. NGOs think that government policies have not
reflected the voices of actual fields. Because government authority thinks that
NGOs have stated their interest rather than the interests of the agricultural
sector as a whole, they could not help having limitations in responding to
related NGOs` voices. That is, public officials understand these phenomena as a
sort of Nimby. In order to solve these problems, NGOs` participation
should be directed to setting up their substantial participation.
It is very meaningful for government authorities to carry out
cooperative projects with NGOs. Korean agriculture is not competitive as a
whole. Only a few items have competitiveness. Rebuilding agricultural
vitality depends upon the change of paradigm based on the new recognition of
agriculture and rural areas such as multi-functionality. The basic premise
in building a new paradigm is that the protection of agriculture and government
subsidy should be based on general people's consensus. NGOs are the most
desirable organizations that try to pursue their goals without their own
interests according to the principles of social justice and public interest in
order to gain people's consensus. Some projects that need public relations
carried out by NGOs having integrity may be better than by government
agencies.
In this aspect, existing policy response of policy authority may not be
active. Although government authorities formalize NGO`s participation
according to timely needs, their positive will has been positive in establishing
a new paradigm for policy participation. They do not recognize the necessity and
value of NGO`s participation in the policy process in terms of the protection of
agriculture based on the persuasion of people.
The desirable way of civilian policy participation is that agricultural
policy authority should recognize NGOs as policy partners and carry out
agricultural projects substantially. The way of cooperation between NGOs and
policy authorities should be different from issues and make sure the roles
of NGOs and policy authority. Especially, NGOs carry out projects that need the
consensus of people and public relations.
There are some improvements in relationship between NGOs and policy
authorities. First, mutual understanding between them should be expanded. Both
sides should expand relationships and put lots of efforts to understand
each other. Also, existing relationship of the provision of supports and the
reception of benefits should be changed to the relationship of mutual
cooperation. Second, the way of policy participation of NGOs should be
diversified and substantialized such as participating committees having
decision-making authority and the delegation of agricultural policy
implementation. The objects of privatization of agricultural policy areas are
education for consumers and general public and commercialized fields enabling to
run projects without government supports. For example, the involved are the
education for environmentally friendly agriculture and retuning to the farming,
green tourism and rural amenity, consulting farming, and so on.
Foreign cases shed some lights on reforming the mode of policy
participation of NGOs. French Agricultural Lead Committee can be adopted.
However, institutional improvement needs other previous conditions like
government organizational reform.
- 발간물 유형
- KREI 보고서
- Files in This Item:
- There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.