| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | 김동원 | - |
| dc.contributor.other | 박혜진 | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2018-11-15T07:56:49Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2018-11-15T07:56:49Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2003-07 | - |
| dc.identifier.other | D154-3 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.krei.re.kr/handle/2018.oak/14557 | - |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 목 차 1. 개 요 2. 주요 이슈와 여론 동향 2.1. ‘참여정부’ 주요 농정방향과 각계 여론 2.2. 수매가 ‘동결’…수매제 폐지 논란 2.3. WTO/DDA 농업협상 답보…EU, 농업개혁 합의로 새국면 2.4. 한-칠레 FTA 국회비준과 피해대책 논란 2.5. 농가부채 대책 2.6. 농업 구조조정 방향과 여론 2.7. 농협개혁 요구와 방향 2.8. 농민단체 동향 2.9. 새만금사업 부분개발로 ‘가닥’…법원 ‘잠정중단’ 결정 파문 2.10. 대북 쌀 지원 추진에 대한 여론 동향 2.11. 우유감산정책 논란…감축 합의로 일단락 2.12. 기타 농촌경제 동향 3. 월별 동향 3.1. 1월 동향 3.2. 2월 동향 3.3. 3월 동향 3.4. 4월 동향 3.5. 5월 동향 3.6. 6월 동향 | - |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | NGO`s activities can be legitimate because they are based on social phenomena and because NGOs play an important role in responding to social dysfunction. Also, the appearance of the concept of global governance shows the importance of NGO`s activities and the necessity of their participation in the policy process. The purposes of this study are to analyze how NGOs participate in the agricultural policy process and to depict what the desirable ways of their policy participation are. Research methods for this study are as follows: first, in order to analyze the real situations of policy participation of agriculture-related NGOs, we analyzed twenty eight agriculture-related NGOs based on the data collected by questionnaire and interviews and compared them with data gained by analyzing fifty eight general NGOs located in Seoul; second, in order to evaluate the participation of agriculture-related NGOs in the policy process, we conducted questionnaire from interviewing NGOs` staffs and public officials and compared two groups. It is proved that the objective conditions of NGOs are not related to the positiveness or spontaneity of their activities. The positiveness and spontaneity of their activities are not closely related to the objective conditions, but to their intrinsic goals and characteristics. The necessity of NGOs` participation in the policy process is recognized by NGOs and policy authorities. NGO`s participation can make policy makers agricultural policies based on real fields and establish cooperation relationship between two groups. Also, they have common opinion about NGO`s participation in setting up the fundamental plan like mid- and long-term agricultural and rural development plans. On the other hand, there are differences in the disadvantages of NGO`s participation and the obstacles on the activation of NGO`s participation. There were considerable changes in the ways and modes of NGO`s participation. The modes and ways of participation have been diversified such as movement shifts from illegal riots to legal and formal participation of being a partner of formal committees and commissions. However, in general, the participation is still more formal. NGOs think that government policies have not reflected the voices of actual fields. Because government authority thinks that NGOs have stated their interest rather than the interests of the agricultural sector as a whole, they could not help having limitations in responding to related NGOs` voices. That is, public officials understand these phenomena as a sort of Nimby. In order to solve these problems, NGOs` participation should be directed to setting up their substantial participation. It is very meaningful for government authorities to carry out cooperative projects with NGOs. Korean agriculture is not competitive as a whole. Only a few items have competitiveness. Rebuilding agricultural vitality depends upon the change of paradigm based on the new recognition of agriculture and rural areas such as multi-functionality. The basic premise in building a new paradigm is that the protection of agriculture and government subsidy should be based on general people's consensus. NGOs are the most desirable organizations that try to pursue their goals without their own interests according to the principles of social justice and public interest in order to gain people's consensus. Some projects that need public relations carried out by NGOs having integrity may be better than by government agencies. In this aspect, existing policy response of policy authority may not be active. Although government authorities formalize NGO`s participation according to timely needs, their positive will has been positive in establishing a new paradigm for policy participation. They do not recognize the necessity and value of NGO`s participation in the policy process in terms of the protection of agriculture based on the persuasion of people. The desirable way of civilian policy participation is that agricultural policy authority should recognize NGOs as policy partners and carry out agricultural projects substantially. The way of cooperation between NGOs and policy authorities should be different from issues and make sure the roles of NGOs and policy authority. Especially, NGOs carry out projects that need the consensus of people and public relations. There are some improvements in relationship between NGOs and policy authorities. First, mutual understanding between them should be expanded. Both sides should expand relationships and put lots of efforts to understand each other. Also, existing relationship of the provision of supports and the reception of benefits should be changed to the relationship of mutual cooperation. Second, the way of policy participation of NGOs should be diversified and substantialized such as participating committees having decision-making authority and the delegation of agricultural policy implementation. The objects of privatization of agricultural policy areas are education for consumers and general public and commercialized fields enabling to run projects without government supports. For example, the involved are the education for environmentally friendly agriculture and retuning to the farming, green tourism and rural amenity, consulting farming, and so on. Foreign cases shed some lights on reforming the mode of policy participation of NGOs. French Agricultural Lead Committee can be adopted. However, institutional improvement needs other previous conditions like government organizational reform. | - |
| dc.publisher | 한국농촌경제연구원 | - |
| dc.title | 2003년 상반기 농정 이슈와 여론 동향 | - |
| dc.title.alternative | Agricultural policy issues and public opinion trends (1H, 2003) | - |
| dc.type | KREI 보고서 | - |
| dc.contributor.alternativeName | Kim, Dongweon | - |
| dc.contributor.alternativeName | Park, Hyejin | - |
| dc.subject.keyword | 농업정책 | - |
| dc.subject.keyword | 농업경제문헌검색어집 | - |
- Files in This Item:
- There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.