|dc.description.tableofcontents||1. 서론2. 협상의 배경3. WTO 패널과 상소심에서의 협상쟁점4. 협상결과와 문제점 및 결론||-|
|dc.description.tableofcontents||The appellate body of WTO made a final decision on Korea-Measures AffectingImports of Fresh, Chilled and Frozen Beef on December 11, 2000. In this paper,we studied about the case to find the legal reasoning for the report of theappellate body. Legal interpretation was employed to this end. We foundeach view of the party on Article Ⅲ:4 and Article ⅩⅩ(d) of the GATT 1994 wasquite different, therefore, it leads to different reasoning on dual retailsystem of Korea.Korea agreed to take proper measures under the GATT 1994 and the Agreement.However, Korea did not lose every case. Korea's domestic support for beefwas justified by the appellate body. It means Korea's ability to defenditself legally in international organization was improved. In addition tothat, Korea should provide more legally armed experts in thisarea.||-|
|dc.title||우리나라에 대한 WTO 쇠고기 분쟁과 GATT 1994 해석의 문제||-|
|dc.title.alternative||Korean Frozen Beef Dispute in WTO and Problems of Interpretation on GATT 1994||-|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.