DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 김은영 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-11-15T08:39:22Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-11-15T08:39:22Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2001-12 | - |
dc.identifier.other | RE24-4-08 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.krei.re.kr/handle/2018.oak/17206 | - |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 1. 서론 2. 협상의 배경 3. WTO 패널과 상소심에서의 협상쟁점 4. 협상결과와 문제점 및 결론 | - |
dc.description.tableofcontents | The appellate body of WTO made a final decision on Korea-Measures Affecting Imports of Fresh, Chilled and Frozen Beef on December 11, 2000. In this paper, we studied about the case to find the legal reasoning for the report of the appellate body. Legal interpretation was employed to this end. We found each view of the party on Article Ⅲ:4 and Article ⅩⅩ(d) of the GATT 1994 was quite different, therefore, it leads to different reasoning on dual retail system of Korea. Korea agreed to take proper measures under the GATT 1994 and the Agreement. However, Korea did not lose every case. Korea's domestic support for beef was justified by the appellate body. It means Korea's ability to defend itself legally in international organization was improved. In addition to that, Korea should provide more legally armed experts in this area. | - |
dc.publisher | KREI | - |
dc.title | 우리나라에 대한 WTO 쇠고기 분쟁과 GATT 1994 해석의 문제 | - |
dc.title.alternative | Korean Frozen Beef Dispute in WTO and Problems of Interpretation on GATT 1994 | - |
dc.type | KREI 논문 | - |
dc.contributor.alternativeName | Kim, Eunyoung | - |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.