DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김은영-
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-15T08:39:22Z-
dc.date.available2018-11-15T08:39:22Z-
dc.date.issued2001-12-
dc.identifier.otherRE24-4-08-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.krei.re.kr/handle/2018.oak/17206-
dc.description.tableofcontents1. 서론2. 협상의 배경3. WTO 패널과 상소심에서의 협상쟁점4. 협상결과와 문제점 및 결론-
dc.description.tableofcontentsThe appellate body of WTO made a final decision on Korea-Measures AffectingImports of Fresh, Chilled and Frozen Beef on December 11, 2000. In this paper,we studied about the case to find the legal reasoning for the report of theappellate body. Legal interpretation was employed to this end. We foundeach view of the party on Article Ⅲ:4 and Article ⅩⅩ(d) of the GATT 1994 wasquite different, therefore, it leads to different reasoning on dual retailsystem of Korea.Korea agreed to take proper measures under the GATT 1994 and the Agreement.However, Korea did not lose every case. Korea's domestic support for beefwas justified by the appellate body. It means Korea's ability to defenditself legally in international organization was improved. In addition tothat, Korea should provide more legally armed experts in thisarea.-
dc.publisherKREI-
dc.title우리나라에 대한 WTO 쇠고기 분쟁과 GATT 1994 해석의 문제-
dc.title.alternativeKorean Frozen Beef Dispute in WTO and Problems of Interpretation on GATT 1994-
dc.typeKREI 논문-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Eunyoung-
Appears in Collections:
학술지 논문 > 농촌경제 / JRD
Files in This Item:
우리나라에 대한 WTO 쇠고기 분쟁과 GATT 1994 해석의 문제.pdf (1.08 MB) Download

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.