DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorVladislav Valentinov-
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-15T08:51:40Z-
dc.date.available2018-11-15T08:51:40Z-
dc.date.issued2006-01-
dc.identifier.otherJRD28-2-04-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.krei.re.kr/handle/2018.oak/18491-
dc.description.abstractThe paper develops an organizational economics approach to explaining rural governance by viewing rural partnerships as a governance mechanism that can be used for organization of rural development activities along with markets and hierarchies. Utilizing the framework of the property rights theory of the firm and transaction cost economics, it is argued that rural partnerships exhibit superior transaction cost-economizing attributes due to their ability to accommodate high commonality of interests of local actors in the sustainable development of their rural areas. This argumentation is based on the proposition to regard the commonality of transaction participants' interests, rather than transaction attributes, as a major determinant of suitability of governance mechanisms to specific transactions. The paper concludes with the discussion of limitations of partnership-based governance.-
dc.description.abstractThe paper develops an organizational economics approach to explaining rural governance by viewing rural partnerships as a governance mechanism that can be used for organization of rural development activities along with markets and hierarchies. Utilizing the framework of the property rights theory of the firm and transaction cost economics, it is argued that rural partnerships exhibit superior transaction cost-economizing attributes due to their ability to accommodate high commonality of interests of local actors in the sustainable development of their rural areas. This argumentation is based on the proposition to regard the commonality of transaction participants' interests, rather than transaction attributes, as a major determinant of suitability of governance mechanisms to specific transactions. The paper concludes with the discussion of limitations of partnership-based governance.-
dc.description.tableofcontentsⅠ. Introduction Ⅱ. Governance mechanisms in organizational economics Ⅲ. Identifying the transaction cost-economizing role of partnerships Ⅳ. Paradoxes of partnership-based governance Ⅴ. Concluding Remarks-
dc.description.tableofcontentsⅠ. Introduction Ⅱ. Governance mechanisms in organizational economics Ⅲ. Identifying the transaction cost-economizing role of partnerships Ⅳ. Paradoxes of partnership-based governance Ⅴ. Concluding Remarks-
dc.publisherIAMO-
dc.titleRURAL PARTNERSHIP AS A GOVERNANCE MECHANISM: TOWARD AN ORGANIZATIONAL ECONOMICS PERSPECTIVE ON RURAL GOVERNANCE-
dc.title.alternativeRURAL PARTNERSHIP AS A GOVERNANCE MECHANISM: TOWARD AN ORGANIZATIONAL ECONOMICS PERSPECTIVE ON RURAL GOVERNANCE-
dc.typeKREI 논문-
dc.citation.endPage183-
dc.citation.startPage159-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameVladislav Valentinov-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationpage. 159 - 183-
dc.subject.keywordrural partnership-
dc.subject.keywordrural development-
dc.subject.keywordgovernance mechanism-
dc.subject.keywordtransaction costs-
dc.subject.keywordproperty rights-
dc.subject.keywordrural partnership-
dc.subject.keywordrural development-
dc.subject.keywordgovernance mechanism-
dc.subject.keywordtransaction costs-
dc.subject.keywordproperty rights-
Appears in Collections:
학술지 논문 > 농촌경제 / JRD
Files in This Item:
RURAL PARTNERSHIP AS A GOVERNANCE MECHANISM: TOWARD AN ORGANIZATIONAL ECONOMICS PERSPECTIVE ON RURAL GOVERNANCE.pdf (270.95 kB) Download

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.