DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author윤영만-
dc.contributor.other박현태-
dc.contributor.other김연중-
dc.contributor.other한혜성-
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-15T09:44:45Z-
dc.date.available2018-11-15T09:44:45Z-
dc.date.issued2012-10-19-
dc.identifier.otherRE35-4-06-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.krei.re.kr/handle/2018.oak/20120-
dc.description.abstractThis study conducted a case study analyzing the cost and benefits of biogas plants that use livestock manure to produce biogas. The purpose was to review the possibility of expanding the facilities across the country. According to the analysis results, it was found that in most cases economic viability would be very low if the revenue is earned through the selling of surplus electricity only. If we consider the sales revenue from surplus power as the direct benefit(Scenario 1), the compensation rate would be 24.8% of total facility cost. However, in Scenario 2 where we consider private investment as the only cost, the compensation rate would be 34.0% of the total cost. It was found that if indirect benefit is taken into account, only the biogas facility in Jeju Island would generate an economic benefit of 381 won/㎥. In the cost analysis of private investment, it was estimated that the economic benefit of the biogas plants would be 2,565~4,809 won/㎥, that is, excluding two plants in Suncheon and Changnyeong that are built with private investment only and another two plants in Anseong that are built for experimental purpose only. Therefore, in order to improve the economic viability of manure biogas plants, government support is needed more than anything else to share the initial facility cost.-
dc.description.abstractThis study conducted a case study analyzing the cost and benefits of biogas plants that use livestock manure to produce biogas. The purpose was to review the possibility of expanding the facilities across the country. According to the analysis results, it was found that in most cases economic viability would be very low if the revenue is earned through the selling of surplus electricity only. If we consider the sales revenue from surplus power as the direct benefit(Scenario 1), the compensation rate would be 24.8% of total facility cost. However, in Scenario 2 where we consider private investment as the only cost, the compensation rate would be 34.0% of the total cost. It was found that if indirect benefit is taken into account, only the biogas facility in Jeju Island would generate an economic benefit of 381 won/㎥. In the cost analysis of private investment, it was estimated that the economic benefit of the biogas plants would be 2,565~4,809 won/㎥, that is, excluding two plants in Suncheon and Changnyeong that are built with private investment only and another two plants in Anseong that are built for experimental purpose only. Therefore, in order to improve the economic viability of manure biogas plants, government support is needed more than anything else to share the initial facility cost.-
dc.description.tableofcontents1. 머리말 2. 비용·편익 분석을 위한 전제 3. 사례 분석 결과 4. 맺음말-
dc.publisher한국농촌경제연구원-
dc.title바이오가스 생산시설의 비용·편익 사례 분석-
dc.title.alternativeA Cost-Benefit Analysis of Biogas Plant-
dc.typeKREI 논문-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameYoon, Youngman-
dc.contributor.alternativeNamePark, Hyuntae-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Yeanjung-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameHan, Hyesung-
dc.subject.keyword바이오가스 생산시설-
dc.subject.keyword신재생에너지-
dc.subject.keyword비용-편익-
dc.subject.keyword청정에너지-
dc.subject.keywordbiogas plant-
dc.subject.keywordnew and renewable energy-
dc.subject.keywordcost-benefit-
dc.subject.keywordclean energy-
Appears in Collections:
학술지 논문 > 농촌경제 / JRD
Files in This Item:
바이오가스 생산시설의 비용·편익 사례 분석.pdf (588.25 kB) Download

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.