Changes in Income Structure by Type of Farm and Policy Implications

영문 제목
Changes in Income Structure by Type of Farm and Policy Implications
저자
김미복오내원황의식
출판년도
2016-12-14
초록
○ Farm household income, which increased by 11.3% in 2013 from the previous year, has beenon the rise for the three consecutive years (by 1.0% in 2014 and 6.5% in 2015), raisingexpectations for the recovery of the economy of farm households.○ The policy implications that lie in the positive phenomena of the increase in farm householdincome can be identified by an analysis of each type of farm household, avoiding the conceptof average of farms and classifying the effects of various factors, including the expansion offarming size, specialization of farming, aging farming population, and a growing number ofsmall-sized farms.○ Each type of farm households, which are classified based on the age of the farm manager (theage of 65) and the standard farming size (2 ha), is characterized as follows.- Group 1, medium/large-sized farms run by young and middle-aged farmers: A group offarmers aged 56 on average. Those in their 40s and 50s account for 75% of this group, andthese farms have high potential for growth in the agricultural sector.- Group 2, small-sized farms run by young and middle-aged farmers: A group that mostlyconsists of part-time farms (Type 2 part-time farms account for over 57%) and other varioustypes of small-scale farms, including new starters, Type 1 and Type 2 part-time farms. It isimportant for this group to increase opportunities for economic activities.- Group 3, small-sized farms run by aged farmers: A group of farmers aged 74 on average.This group takes up over 50% of the total farm households in the country and has poorfarming infrastructure.- Group 4, medium/large-sized farms run by aged farmers: A group of farmers aged 71 onaverage. This group is mostly comprised of rice-growing farms, but still has large-scaleagricultural resources, and 60% of this group have no successor.○ In terms of the group of medium/large-sized farms run by young and middle-aged farmers, amajority of them have benefited from policies for improving income structure and strengtheningcompetitiveness. But in order to help them grow in a stable way, measures for managementstabilization are needed for high-risk farm households with heavy debt.○ For small-sized farms run by aged farmers, a variety of support policies should be strengthened,including the reinforcement of welfare policies such as the basic living security system, thesupport for securing stable markets to sell a small volume of products, the 6th industrybusinesses jointly managed by community, and the creation of nonfarm income throughregional policies such as local food promotion.○ For small-sized farms run by young and middle-aged farmers, whose base for farming businessis weak, employment policies for rural areas should be strengthened to help them secure stablenonfarm income, while income growth should be encouraged for some farm households byexpanding farming size.○ In terms of medium/large-sized farms run by aged farmers whose base for farming is solid, itis necessary to encourage them to improve productivity and increase agricultural incomethrough systematized farming and secure human resources as successors to maintain theirinfrastructure for production.
발행처
한국농촌경제연구원
발간물 유형
KREI 이슈리포트
URI
http://repository.krei.re.kr/handle/2018.oak/22258
Appears in Collections:
이슈페이퍼 > 농정포커스 (J)
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML
Files in This Item:
Changes in Income Structure by Type of Farm and Policy Implications.pdf (419.22 kB) Download

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE