DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김홍상-
dc.contributor.other신은정-
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-15T07:59:18Z-
dc.date.available2018-11-15T07:59:18Z-
dc.date.issued2004-12-
dc.identifier.otherC2004-34-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.krei.re.kr/handle/2018.oak/14742-
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this research is to suggest the policy issues and directions of reorganizing the agricultural water management systems(AWMS). Especially, it focuses at the way to unify two separated irrigation water managers to relieve farmers' complaints about inequality of cost-payment and to resolve problems occurred by the separated management system. To address this purpose, this research overviews the current situations and problems of AWMS and new trends and changes in agricultural water management.Significant problems of AWMS can be summarized into five ones as follows; (1) inequality in paying management cost, (2) lack of farmers' participation in irrigation water management, (3) increasing government subsidy and unstable financial source, (4) difficulties of integrated management owing to separated management systems, (5) overall deterioration of irrigation facilities.As those problems have gotten more serious, agricultural or rural issues have changed tremendously. Especially, recent rapid urbanization and industrialization have resulted in an increased water demand for various sectors like municipal, industrial, intensive farming, and environment-friendly farming etc. and urge the value of irrigation water in the point of view of environment, safety, landscape to be reevaluated.Based on the above, the basic directions of reorganizing AWMS can be introduced as follows. (1) an integrated management system based on watershed to improve equality in water use which is degraded by separated management systems, (2) a participatory management system with farmers, local authorities and people, (3)a social allocation system based on the benefit(user-pay) principle and considered on public value of agricultural water and irrigation facilities. Under these directions, we can consider three ways as feasible measures to reorganize AWMS in brief. One is the way to unify two separated AWMSs and another is to establish the third organization as a new local manager. The other is to keep today's AWMS and fix its problems gradually. The first one is analyzed as the reorganized system with the results of survey that most of stake-holders such as government, KARICO, local authorities and farmers preferred to unifying AWMS into KARICO(Korea Agricultural and Rural Infrastructure Corporation).In order to unify AWMS into KARICO and reorganize it as efficient and effective AWMS, these policy issues should be considered; (1) to enlarge the opportunities for farmers and local people to participate in agricultural water management, (2) to take some financial measures to cover additional management cost, (3) to prepare legal and institutional vehicles to compensate private facilities, land and so on, (4) to improve specialty as a management expertise, (5) to survey all the irrigation facilities around the country completely and to modernize outdated irrigation facilities.Researcher : Kim Hong-Sang, Shin Eun-JungE-mail : hskim@krei.re.kr-
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this research is to suggest the policy issues and directions of reorganizing the agricultural water management systems(AWMS). Especially, it focuses at the way to unify two separated irrigation water managers to relieve farmers' complaints about inequality of cost-payment and to resolve problems occurred by the separated management system. To address this purpose, this research overviews the current situations and problems of AWMS and new trends and changes in agricultural water management.Significant problems of AWMS can be summarized into five ones as follows; (1) inequality in paying management cost, (2) lack of farmers' participation in irrigation water management, (3) increasing government subsidy and unstable financial source, (4) difficulties of integrated management owing to separated management systems, (5) overall deterioration of irrigation facilities.As those problems have gotten more serious, agricultural or rural issues have changed tremendously. Especially, recent rapid urbanization and industrialization have resulted in an increased water demand for various sectors like municipal, industrial, intensive farming, and environment-friendly farming etc. and urge the value of irrigation water in the point of view of environment, safety, landscape to be reevaluated.Based on the above, the basic directions of reorganizing AWMS can be introduced as follows. (1) an integrated management system based on watershed to improve equality in water use which is degraded by separated management systems, (2) a participatory management system with farmers, local authorities and people, (3)a social allocation system based on the benefit(user-pay) principle and considered on public value of agricultural water and irrigation facilities. Under these directions, we can consider three ways as feasible measures to reorganize AWMS in brief. One is the way to unify two separated AWMSs and another is to establish the third organization as a new local manager. The other is to keep today's AWMS and fix its problems gradually. The first one is analyzed as the reorganized system with the results of survey that most of stake-holders such as government, KARICO, local authorities and farmers preferred to unifying AWMS into KARICO(Korea Agricultural and Rural Infrastructure Corporation).In order to unify AWMS into KARICO and reorganize it as efficient and effective AWMS, these policy issues should be considered; (1) to enlarge the opportunities for farmers and local people to participate in agricultural water management, (2) to take some financial measures to cover additional management cost, (3) to prepare legal and institutional vehicles to compensate private facilities, land and so on, (4) to improve specialty as a management expertise, (5) to survey all the irrigation facilities around the country completely and to modernize outdated irrigation facilities.Researcher : Kim Hong-Sang, Shin Eun-JungE-mail : hskim@krei.re.kr-
dc.description.tableofcontents제1장 서 론1. 연구의 배경과 목적 12. 연구의 범위와 방법 4제2장 농업용수 및 수리시설 유지관리체계와 관리실태1. 유지관리체계의 변천 경위 62. 유지관리주체 및 수리시설의 현황 113. 농업용수 및 수리시설의 관리실태 19제3장 농업용수 및 수리시설 관리의 문제점1. 비용부담 및 서비스질의 불공평 352. 농업인 참여 부족 403. 국가 부담 증대와 불안정한 재원 424. 수계단위 통합적 관리의 곤란 455. 전반적인 시설 노후화 46제4장 농업용수 및 수리시설 관리체계 개편의 방향1. 관리체계 개편의 기본 방향 정립 492. 관리체계 개편 방안 검토 613. 농업기반공사로의 편입?통합관리 방안 72제5장 농업용수 및 수리시설 관리체계 개편을 위한 정책과제1. 농업인 참여 확대와 농업기반공사 운영체계 개선 802. 추가되는 유지관리비용 확보 823. 사유 시설 및 토지 보상 등과 관련된 법적?제도적 보완 854. 관리조직의 전문성 제고 865. 수리시설의 일제조사와 시설 현대화 87제6장 요약 및 결론 89Abstract 93참고문헌 95부 록 99-
dc.publisher한국농촌경제연구원-
dc.title농업용수 관리체계 개편의 방향과 정책과제-
dc.title.alternativePolicy Issues and Directions of Reorganizing the Agricultural Water Management Systems-
dc.typeKREI 보고서-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Hongsang-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameShin, Eunjung-
Appears in Collections:
연구보고서 > 수탁보고서 (C)
Files in This Item:
농업용수 관리체계 개편의 방향과 정책과제.pdf (1.13 MB) Download

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.