WTO 농업협상 관세감축 방식 분석
- 영문 제목
- How Tariff Reduction Methods Affect the WTO Agriculture Negotiations?
- 저자
- 최세균
- 출판년도
- 2002-12-31
- 목차
- AbstractThis studyfocuses on the effects of tariff reduction by tariff reduction methods for 10major countries. Six different tariff reduction methods have been applied tomeasure the tariff reduction rates. Tariff reduction rates from the methodapplied in the Uruguay Round are compared with outcomes from the other methods.A Swiss formula with a ceiling tariff rate 25% gives rise to the deepest cut.However, this formula brings shallow cut of tariffs compared with the UruguayRound formula for some countries including the U.S., Australia and Chile. ASwiss formula with a ceiling tariff rate of 100% makes eight out of tencountries better off. A Swiss formula will be disastrous only for Korea andJapan. Therefore, possibility is high to accept formula tariff cut in DDAagriculture negotiations.1. 머리말2. 관세감축 공식3. 자료4.분석결과5. 맺음말
AbstractThis studyfocuses on the effects of tariff reduction by tariff reduction methods for 10major countries. Six different tariff reduction methods have been applied tomeasure the tariff reduction rates. Tariff reduction rates from the methodapplied in the Uruguay Round are compared with outcomes from the other methods.A Swiss formula with a ceiling tariff rate 25% gives rise to the deepest cut.However, this formula brings shallow cut oftariffs compared with the Uruguay Round formula for some countries including theU.S., Australia and Chile. A Swiss formula with a ceiling tariff rate of 100%makes eight out of ten countries better off. A Swiss formula will be disastrousonly for Korea and Japan. Therefore, possibility is high to accept formulatariff cut in DDA agriculture negotiations.
- 발행처
- KREI
- 발간물 유형
- KREI 논문
- Appears in Collections:
- 학술지 논문 > 농촌경제 / JRD
- Files in This Item:
- WTO 농업협상 관세감축 방식 분석.pdf (231.88 kB) Download
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.