농산어촌 마을 패널 조사 사업 (2/10차년도)

Abstract

농산어촌의 지속가능성 문제를 섬세하게 진단하여 적절한 대응책을 찾는 일은 마을 단위의 미시적인 변화 실태 고찰을 바탕으로 해야 한다. 이를 위해서는 장기적인 관점에서 마을 패널 자료를 구축하여 농산어촌 변화 상황을 연속적·동태적으로 모니터링하는 것이 요구된다.이 연구는 전국 102개 마을을 농산어촌 마을을 패널로 선정하고 매년 마을의 변화를 조사한다. 또한 농산어촌에서 새롭거나 의미가 큰 변화를 포착하여 이에 대한 심층 분석을 토대로 농산어촌 정책의 방향을 제안하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 기존 통계조사의 한계를 보완하는 연도별 조사를 통해 정책 시사점을 얻고, 이를 통해 농산어촌 정책 수립의 근거 자료를 마련하고자 한다.

Background and Purpose ○ An inspection into microscopic changes in villages is essential to precisely diagnose sustainability issues in rural areas and respond to them appropriately. In particular, a long-term approach based on village panel data is required to track changes continuously. Isolated studies on specific topics have fundamental limits in understanding various phenomena and their causes in rural communities. Therefore, making up for previous statistical research and accumulating grounds for policy establishment are required by monitoring changes in villages and the factors driving them based on panel data. ○ This study aims to monitor changes in villages every year by selecting representative rural communities. Also, it intends to grab new and significant changes in rural villages and suggest policy direction based on an in-depth analysis of those changes. Furthermore, it plans to gain implications through yearly research to supplement prior statistical studies and prepare grounds for rural policy setup. Research Methodology ○ This study is a ten-year project, and 2021 is the second year. We maintained the mainframe of the first-year research but made up for it through primary panel surveys. We used the results for actual state analysis. Also, we conducted a separate study on sustainability issues by inspecting unique changes in rural areas, including depopulation and the emergence of the linked population (urban people linked to rural areas through regular visiting or residence for a certain period). We interviewed the heads of the selected 102 panel villages using the structured questionnaire and visited them for observation. We surveyed residents of 23 villages and the linked population who visited those villages for our in-depth research. (For more information, please refer to the report.)